SManager 2.2.4

s300 and SManager software questions & answers
User avatar
Spunkster
Site Admin
Posts: 22822
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 5:06 pm
Location: Hondata

Re: SManager 2.2.3 (beta)

Post by Spunkster »

We will test this fully tomorrow and see if there is a software issue.
blackek4
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:06 pm

Re: SManager 2.2.3 (beta)

Post by blackek4 »

ok, let us know the results. thanks
User avatar
Hondata
Site Admin
Posts: 10452
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Torrance, CA
Contact:

Re: SManager 2.2.3 (beta)

Post by Hondata »

It was a problem; we have fixed it now & will re-release shortly.
Hondata
blackek4
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:06 pm

Re: SManager 2.2.3 (beta)

Post by blackek4 »

Hondata wrote:It was a problem; we have fixed it now & will re-release shortly.
is the 2.2.4 beta supposed to correct the problems that i have reported earlier? i'm having the exact same problems.

just to remember
under closed loop:
- Max Engine Speed - Can't set it for more than 8000rpm just keeps reverting to 8000 when I do the tab.
- Closed Loop Max TPS (Low) & (High) - I tryed to set max rpm to more than 8000 and it doesn't let me.
- Closed Loop Max TPS (Low) & (High) - I set 100% to TPS %, but only assumes 99%.

And just a doubt regarding tip-in retard conditions, does both conditions need to be meet, for the retard occur, or just one of them? for example, if i'm in 2nd gear, at 5000rpm doing 50km/h, and i have set for the tip-in, vehicle speed min. 10 max. 140 and engine speed min. 1000 max. 4500, will the retard occur or not?
User avatar
Hondata
Site Admin
Posts: 10452
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Torrance, CA
Contact:

Re: SManager 2.2.4 (beta)

Post by Hondata »

The internal limit of the ECU is 8000 rpm for some parameters. If the highest rpm index for the maximum TPS for closed loop is 8000 rpm this does not mean that closed loop is limited to 8000 rpm - it just is the highest value of the index.

As for the tip in parameters, both conditions need to be met.
Hondata
blackek4
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:06 pm

Re: SManager 2.2.4 (beta)

Post by blackek4 »

Hondata wrote:The internal limit of the ECU is 8000 rpm for some parameters. If the highest rpm index for the maximum TPS for closed loop is 8000 rpm this does not mean that closed loop is limited to 8000 rpm - it just is the highest value of the index.

As for the tip in parameters, both conditions need to be met.
Ok so let me see if I get this straight, although I can't set more than 8000 on max engine speed and on Closed Loop Max TPS, it will maintain the closed loop condition up to 9000 p.e.? based on what condition? map sensor?

And how about the % off TPS? will it also maintain the closed loop condition when it's set to 99% in the table, but it reads 100%?
User avatar
Hondata
Site Admin
Posts: 10452
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Torrance, CA
Contact:

Re: SManager 2.2.4 (beta)

Post by Hondata »

If the last index of the table is 8000 rpm then it will just use the last table value no matter what the rpm goes up to.

The 99% TPS is another internal ECU thing. It will work the same as 100% (that at least is in the help file).
Hondata
blackek4
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:06 pm

Re: SManager 2.2.4 (beta)

Post by blackek4 »

Hondata wrote:If the last index of the table is 8000 rpm then it will just use the last table value no matter what the rpm goes up to.

The 99% TPS is another internal ECU thing. It will work the same as 100% (that at least is in the help file).
thank you for the clarification.
nayr_one
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:49 pm
Location: greeley co

Re: SManager 2.2.4 (beta)

Post by nayr_one »

have you fixed the output test function this feature seems like it will be really handy.
User avatar
Spunkster
Site Admin
Posts: 22822
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 5:06 pm
Location: Hondata

Re: SManager 2.2.4 (beta)

Post by Spunkster »

The output functions have worked since they were introduced. You must have real-time update turned on.
allm0t0rGSR
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:51 pm

Re: SManager 2.2.4 (beta)

Post by allm0t0rGSR »

i have a problem with boost control, when im in full boost it show 0 or 1% pwm which suppose to be at 50%, it explain more in the datalog... thanks
Attachments
Mini Me boosted.skl
calibration
(42.47 KiB) Downloaded 173 times
pwm.s3d
datalog
(95.99 KiB) Downloaded 168 times
allm0t0rGSR
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:51 pm

Re: SManager 2.2.4 (beta)

Post by allm0t0rGSR »

allm0t0rGSR wrote:i have a problem with boost control, when im in full boost it show 0 or 1% pwm which suppose to be at 50%, it explain more in the datalog... thanks
Anybody out there...
Everything was working before I updated mine to 2.2.4. Thanks
User avatar
Spunkster
Site Admin
Posts: 22822
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 5:06 pm
Location: Hondata

Re: SManager 2.2.4 (beta)

Post by Spunkster »

Why do you have throttle position compensation set to 50%? try setting those back to default settings.
nayr_one
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:49 pm
Location: greeley co

Re: SManager 2.2.4 (beta)

Post by nayr_one »

i tried turning real time update on i still couldnt get it to work... im not a noob we tune a lot of hondata cars. when i check the box should the solenoid start to pulse instantly?
User avatar
Spunkster
Site Admin
Posts: 22822
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 5:06 pm
Location: Hondata

Re: SManager 2.2.4 (beta)

Post by Spunkster »

Turn of the variable frequency in the calibration and the test function should work
Post Reply