Map sensor vs mBar reading

FlashPro questions & answers specific to the 2006-2011 Americas Civic Si
Post Reply
Hondahouse
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2021 9:23 pm

Map sensor vs mBar reading

Post by Hondahouse »

Watching my datalogs, and no matter at what road speed it seems, with only about 25-30% throttle I’m getting about 800 mBar MAP sensor readings and easily going WOT.
Any ideas? Bad sensor or plugged exhaust maybe?
2006 FG2, DC Sports SRI, TAYLOR Helix Throttle body spacer
User avatar
Spunkster
Site Admin
Posts: 22737
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 5:06 pm
Location: Hondata

Re: Map sensor vs mBar reading

Post by Spunkster »

Post your calibration as well as a datalog showing what you are describing.
Hondahouse
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2021 9:23 pm

Re: Map sensor vs mBar reading

Post by Hondahouse »

ok, attached is the calibration file and a datalog.

im hitting 900mBar @ like 50% throttle.
if you look at the fuel maps the 800+ mBar curves seem really high on some cam angles, compared to the lesser....
Also, what is with the symmetrical dips in the fuel curves within the same cam angle maps??

Thanks for the help.
Attachments
Datalog-210201-002.fpdl
(417.37 KiB) Downloaded 73 times
Fujita SRI-TEST-NEWEST CAM -NEW IN PROGRESS.fpcal
(25.33 KiB) Downloaded 69 times
2006 FG2, DC Sports SRI, TAYLOR Helix Throttle body spacer
User avatar
Hondata
Site Admin
Posts: 10434
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Torrance, CA
Contact:

Re: Map sensor vs mBar reading

Post by Hondata »

The MAP / TPS relationship is normal.
Hondata
Hondahouse
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2021 9:23 pm

Re: Map sensor vs mBar reading

Post by Hondahouse »

so a 900mBar reading at 50% throttle is normal @ 18:06 on the datalog (would be same as 100% throttle...), amongst the other 700mBar and higher readings at 20% throttle?

Also should the big dips in the fuel curves be smoothed out even though it goes against suggested lambda adjustments??
2006 FG2, DC Sports SRI, TAYLOR Helix Throttle body spacer
Post Reply