Smoothing rev limiter

FlashPro questions & answers specific to the FN2 European Civic Type R
Post Reply
mladjan
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:16 am

Smoothing rev limiter

Post by mladjan »

Hi,

I would like to smooth out stuff when I reach rev limiter, because rotrex don't like it :)
But before experimenting on the engine itself, is the best to use the same number for rev limit and rev recover? Will it keep it smooth or it will be best to use for example 8600 / 8300?
User avatar
Spunkster
Site Admin
Posts: 22822
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 5:06 pm
Location: Hondata

Re: Smoothing rev limiter

Post by Spunkster »

You will be much better off retarding the timing near the rev-limit as this will lower the power made and make it much smoother.
mladjan
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:16 am

Re: Smoothing rev limiter

Post by mladjan »

Cool, can do this as addition, but what is smoother, 8600/8600 or 8600/8300?
User avatar
Spunkster
Site Admin
Posts: 22822
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 5:06 pm
Location: Hondata

Re: Smoothing rev limiter

Post by Spunkster »

You will have to try the different settings to see what works best in your situation.
User avatar
R-12914
Posts: 349
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:13 pm
Location: Germany/Bavaria

Re: Smoothing rev limiter

Post by R-12914 »

mladjan wrote:Cool, can do this as addition, but what is smoother, 8600/8600 or 8600/8300?
If you have the limiter at 8600 rpms, then try 8500 rpms recover!
Note: The lower the difference, the softer!

BTW: I know, if the speed limiter would non-existent, the engine/Rotrex would still want further! ;-)
2008 Honda Civic TypeR FN2
Rotrex C30-94 supercharged with relocated IAT
Powered by ASNU 092/FP330E fuel pump & ASNU 090/750cc fuel injectors
------------------------
ECU: 37820-RSP-E02
Flashpro: FP-SI-INT-21153
Software: 3.6.1.0
Firmware: 185
typer86
Posts: 342
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 3:17 pm

Re: Smoothing rev limiter

Post by typer86 »

Best result (for my build) is 1:1...
I use currently rev limiter 8400 rpm and for recover 8400 rpm too...
Post Reply