FlashProManager 2.8.4

FlashPro Manager software
User avatar
Hondata
Site Admin
Posts: 10452
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Torrance, CA
Contact:

FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by Hondata »

V2.8.4 (21 September 2017)
  • FlashPro firmware updated to version 122.
  • [FN2] Fixed max fields not showing for active tuning.
  • [2016-2017 Turbo Civic] Added boost by gear limit table and added support for 5AG-P92 - Malaysia, 5AG-Z82 - Thailand, 5AG-U62 - Indonesia, 5AG-Q71 - Australia
Download here
Hondata
janemar
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:24 am

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by janemar »

Quick question?

Will knock control default back to 100% after I upload a calibration using this new 2.8.4 software?

I read somewhere that you defaulted it to 56% knock control value after a reflash for a faster dyno tuning.

The reason I asked is prior reflash, k.control is 54%. After reflash a a quick drive it is at 75%

2017 civic 1.5 cvt
100RON Fuel at +6psi tune, bonestock car.

Thank you!
User avatar
Hondata
Site Admin
Posts: 10452
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Torrance, CA
Contact:

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by Hondata »

Knock control now defaults to 56% after reflashing.
Hondata
mladjan
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:16 am

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by mladjan »

How much time is expected of driving to go back to 0% at 100 octane fuel?
janemar
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:24 am

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by janemar »

Hondata wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2017 1:38 pm Knock control now defaults to 56% after reflashing.

Thanks Hondata,

I noticed that when cruising, k.control is steady at 54%
When boosting hard at 20psi(+6psi basemap) map for 2017 civic 1.5cvt, k.control quickly rises to 70% w/o any knock count? Im using 100 RON fuel.

Same fuel i use on my d16 turbo with 450whp no problems.

What seems to be the issue?

Thanks!
User avatar
Hondata
Site Admin
Posts: 10452
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Torrance, CA
Contact:

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by Hondata »

This is normal. Knock control will vary based on engine noise, it does not need to have knock to alter the knock control.
Hondata
mladjan
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:16 am

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by mladjan »

What he wanted to say is that knock control is not 0% on cruse (as it was few versions before) but its 56% even he uses 100 octane fuel.
Jun43
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 2:59 pm

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by Jun43 »

mladjan wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:49 am What he wanted to say is that knock control is not 0% on cruse (as it was few versions before) but its 56% even he uses 100 octane fuel.
knock control will never be 0% on pump gas. probably wouldn't even hit 0% with race gas?
54 is the lowest it will go on 93octane. 100ron = 95.5 octane
mladjan
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:16 am

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by mladjan »

I have in Europe 100 octane gas. It was 0 before.
janemar
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:24 am

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by janemar »

mladjan wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:49 am What he wanted to say is that knock control is not 0% on cruse (as it was few versions before) but its 56% even he uses 100 octane fuel.
From what I understand, 54% is the lowest you can get with these new versions for the 1.5T flashpros
janemar
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:24 am

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by janemar »

mladjan wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:55 am I have in Europe 100 octane gas. It was 0 before.
Europe uses "RON" for their fuel as well. So we have the same 100 fuel which is around 96PON/AKI fuel.
janemar
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:24 am

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by janemar »

Hondata wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:00 am This is normal. Knock control will vary based on engine noise, it does not need to have knock to alter the knock control.
Thanks hondata, to sum it up. Here are the outside factors which affect k.control, being all things equal.

1. Fuel octane
2. Ambient air temp / humidity / elevation
3. Engine load/RPM

Did I miss something?
Thanks!
typer86
Posts: 342
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 3:17 pm

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by typer86 »

Active Tuning does not work for the FN2 or I am running in the wrong direction.

https://youtu.be/lKQUORqRif4

Please, if a major feature is released - explain how it must be used. A short 2 minutes screencast will answer a lot of questions...
Screencast-O-Matic is a cool simple tool to create screencast very quick.

And I can also confirm on the FN2 the K.Control will be reset back to 55 % after flashing...
User avatar
Hondata
Site Admin
Posts: 10452
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Torrance, CA
Contact:

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by Hondata »

There's two aspects here - the active tuning process and viewing the results of active tuning. You can't blanket both with one statement.
First, to download changes from the ECU you need the calibration as saved after an upload. Downloading from the FlashPro is going to get the calibration as saved before the upload, so it will not work.
Next, it does not work from datalogs, but changes are download directly from the ECU.
Yes, a video would help.
Hondata
myuser
Posts: 77
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 6:55 am

Re: FlashProManager 2.8.4

Post by myuser »

The active tuning tables were sucessfully downloaded from FN2 ECU, although some attention is needed to this points:
  • Maximum load and Maximum lambda is fixed, unable to change;
  • Minimum values could be greater than Maximum values;
  • Restrict maximum values to calibration;
    Example: When insert Maximum VTC like 300 the value changed to 65 and
    the maximum value for the calibration used is 50;
Post Reply